Olufemi Ojaleye, a Nigerian convicted of fraud in the UK, has avoided deportation after a tribunal ruled that his children’s special needs warranted his continued stay in the country.
Ojaleye was sentenced to seven
years imprisonment for playing a leading role in a sophisticated fraud,
conducted over a sustained period, and for profiting from the COVID-related
bounce back loan scheme.
The loan was introduced in 2020 to
support businesses affected by COVID-19, allowing them to borrow between £2,000
and £50,000 at low interest rates.
The case, heard last month, was
disclosed in court papers published on Monday.
UK law mandates that the
deportation of foreign criminals is in the public interest, and that the more
serious the offence, the greater the likelihood of deportation.
There are, however, two
exceptions.
THE EXCEPTIONS
One is where the immigrant
criminal has lawfully resided in the UK for most of his/her life, and is
socially and culturally integrated into the UK, and where there would be
significant obstacles to their reintegration in the country to which they would
be deported.
The other exception is where the
immigrant criminal “has a genuine and subsisting relationship with a qualifying
partner, or a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying
child”, and the effect of their deportation on the partner or child would be
“unduly harsh”.
A “qualifying child” is a child
who is British or who has lived in the UK for a continuous period of at least
seven years.
Ojaleye is the father of four
British children who have two different mothers.
Two of the children have been
diagnosed with autism and were deemed to have “very significant additional
needs”, the court papers showed.
SPECIAL NEEDS
His lawyers argued that the autism
impacts “every aspect of [their] daily life” and they “need support with even
the smallest tasks such as dressing, eating, and toileting”.
They told the court that the
children needed structure and consistency to cope with daily routines.
However, solicitors from the UK
secretary of state for the home department told the court that the reasons were
insufficient, arguing that Ojaleye already spent a chunk of time in prison —
proof that the children could cope without his presence.
In counter-arguments, Ojaleye’s
lawyers said his children visited him in prison.
If Ojaleye were to be deported,
the affected children’s mother said “travelling to Nigeria to visit him would
be impossible” because of their needs, the upper tribunal heard.
The court also heard that the
appellant arrived in the UK as a visitor in September 2002 and has lived in the
country lawfully for most of the period. He only visited Nigeria in 2004.
The case was one of a record
41,987 outstanding immigration appeals, most of them on human rights grounds.
The situation threatens to hamper
the government’s renewed efforts to fast-track the removal of illegal migrants.
Olufemi
Ojaleye, a Nigerian convicted of fraud in the UK, has avoided deportation after
a tribunal ruled that his children’s special needs warranted his continued stay
in the country.
Ojaleye was sentenced to seven
years imprisonment for playing a leading role in a sophisticated fraud,
conducted over a sustained period, and for profiting from the COVID-related
bounce back loan scheme.
The loan was introduced in 2020 to
support businesses affected by COVID-19, allowing them to borrow between £2,000
and £50,000 at low interest rates.
The case, heard last month, was
disclosed in court papers published on Monday.
UK law mandates that the
deportation of foreign criminals is in the public interest, and that the more
serious the offence, the greater the likelihood of deportation.
There are, however, two
exceptions.
THE EXCEPTIONS
One is where the immigrant
criminal has lawfully resided in the UK for most of his/her life, and is
socially and culturally integrated into the UK, and where there would be
significant obstacles to their reintegration in the country to which they would
be deported.
The other exception is where the
immigrant criminal “has a genuine and subsisting relationship with a qualifying
partner, or a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying
child”, and the effect of their deportation on the partner or child would be
“unduly harsh”.
A “qualifying child” is a child
who is British or who has lived in the UK for a continuous period of at least
seven years.
Ojaleye is the father of four
British children who have two different mothers.
Two of the children have been
diagnosed with autism and were deemed to have “very significant additional
needs”, the court papers showed.
SPECIAL NEEDS
His lawyers argued that the autism
impacts “every aspect of [their] daily life” and they “need support with even
the smallest tasks such as dressing, eating, and toileting”.
They told the court that the
children needed structure and consistency to cope with daily routines.
However, solicitors from the UK
secretary of state for the home department told the court that the reasons were
insufficient, arguing that Ojaleye already spent a chunk of time in prison —
proof that the children could cope without his presence.
In counter-arguments, Ojaleye’s
lawyers said his children visited him in prison.
If Ojaleye were to be deported,
the affected children’s mother said “travelling to Nigeria to visit him would
be impossible” because of their needs, the upper tribunal heard.
The court also heard that the
appellant arrived in the UK as a visitor in September 2002 and has lived in the
country lawfully for most of the period. He only visited Nigeria in 2004.
The case was one of a record
41,987 outstanding immigration appeals, most of them on human rights grounds.
The situation threatens to hamper
the government’s renewed efforts to fast-track the removal of illegal migrants.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com