The court of appeal in Abuja has reserved judgment in the
suit filed by Timipre Sylva, candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC)
in the Bayelsa governorship election, seeking to reverse his disqualification.
Demesuoyefa Kolomo, an APC member, had sued Sylva and asked
the court to order the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to
delete his name from the list of candidates contesting the Bayelsa poll.
The plaintiff averred that by the provisions of section
182(1)\(b) of the 1999 constitution, Sylva is not qualified to contest the
election on the platform of APC or any other political party because he was
elected in April 2007 and May 2008.
On October 10, a federal high court in Abuja disqualified Sylva from participating in the Bayelsa election.
The court held that Sylva, having been sworn in twice and
ruled for five years as governor of the state, would breach the 1999 constitution
if allowed to contest again.
Subsequently, the APC filed an appeal challenging the
court’s decision and applied for a stay of execution of the judgement pending
the outcome of the appeal.
However, on Tuesday, INEC removed Sylva’s name from the list
of candidates contesting the Bayelsa poll.
THE HEARING
During the court session on Friday, Akinlolu Kehinde,
Sylva’s lawyer, and K.O Balogun, counsel to APC, urged the court to set aside
the October 10 judgment and affirm Sylva’s candidacy.
Kehinde argued that in his first oath taking, Sylva only
spent six months, three weeks and two days in office before the election was
annuled.
He wondered why the court could have given judgment in
Kolomo’s favour when he did not participate in the primary election that
produced Sylva as an aspirant in accordance with section 285.
He submitted that Koloma lacked locus (legal right) to
institute the suit, hence, it ought to have been dismissed.
“Section 285 strictly defines that you must be an aspirant
to challenge an election and there is a timeframe within which to challenge the
poll,” he said.
“We urge this honourable court to look at our processes and
agree with us that the judgment was an hatchet job just to tie this man
(Sylva), not to campaign and participate in the election.”
Balogun also argued that it was wrong for the court to have
entertained Kolomo’s suit because he lacked the locus to approach the court.
“In 2007, he (Sylva) was elected the governor of Bayelsa
state, but within few months, the court of appeal sacked him,” Balogun said.
“He contested again in 2008 and won. The eight months that
he earlier spent in office was nullified.
“What he (Kolomo) is
doing is fighting a proxy war. He cannot be a member of the APC and be fighting
to destroy its candidate and chances at the election.
“What the 1st respondent is asking this court to do is to
deem the nullified months as 4 years.”
On his part, Abiodun Amuda-Kanike, Kolomo’s lawyer, urged
the court to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Ahmed Mohamed, INEC’s lawyer, also prayed the court to
dismiss both appeals.
Responding, the three-member panel led by Haruna Tsammani,
questioned why Kolomo, who was not an aspirant, would want to destroy his
party’s chance in the election.
The panel said Kolomo could have voted for another party in
the poll if he assumed Sylva did not deserve his vote.
The panel also condemned the attitude of the counsel who
failed to advice their clients appropriately on such issues, saying “it is a
moral issue.”
Tsammani said since the court had chosen to hear the main
appeals, it was unnecessary to hear any interlocutory motions.
After taking all the arguments, the panel reserved judgment
in the appeals at a later date to be communicated to parties.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com