The federal high court in Abuja has refused to extend its
interim order restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
from prosecuting Hudu Yunusa-Ari, suspended Adamawa state resident electoral
commissioner (REC).
Yunusa-Ari had stirred controversy when he declared Aisha
Binani Dahiru of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the winner of the
Adamawa governorship election when the collation of the results was yet to be
completed.
INEC declared the announcement null and void and summoned
the REC to its headquarters in Abuja.
Subsequently, the commission
wrote to the police to prosecute Yunusa-Ari over the electoral
infraction.
On April 20, former President Muhammadu Buhari approved the
suspension of the Adamawa REC pending the completion of investigation by the
police.
Afterwards, INEC said they have filed a six-count charge
against Yunusa-Ari before a high court in Yola, while July 12 was fixed for the
commencement of trial.
However, in an ex-parte motion marked FHC/ABJ/CS/935/2023,
Binani through her counsel, Michael Aondoaka, moved the ex-parte motion to stop
Yunusa-Ari’s prosecution.
The counsel to the APC candidate argued that until the
election petition tribunal decides Binani’s fate in accordance with section 149
of the electoral act, 2022, the prosecution of Yunusa-Ari cannot be said to be
valid.
Donatus Okorowo, presiding judge, ordered the parties to
maintain status quo ante bellum, pending the hearing and determination of the
matter.
The judge had also ordered the respondents — INEC, the
attorney-general of the federation (AGF) and the inspector-general of police
(IGP) — to show cause why the reliefs sought by Binani should not be granted.
At the resumed court session on Tuesday, Rotimi Jacobs, INEC
lawyer, informed the court that the applicant had not served the respondents
with the court’s July 10 order.
Jacobs who also contested the competence and jurisdiction of
the court to entertain the matter in a counter affidavit to the motion, stated
that the lifespan of the interim order expired on July 18.
However, Aondoaka, argued that the interim order cannot
expire since the defendants had not shown cause as directed by the court.
Aondoaka added that the INEC counsel cannot say he was not
served with the processes of the court as he had joined issues in the matter.
The judge refused to extend the interim order previously
granted.
He adjourned the matter to July 24.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com