Adah Obekpa, a US-based medical doctor and his company,
Renaissance Network Africa (RNA), have sued the Independent National Electoral
Commission (INEC) and the federal government over an alleged failure to
recognise them as the originators of the e-voting system used during elections.
The suit was filed before the Abuja federal high court on
March 21.
In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/391/2023, the plaintiffs are
praying the court for an order directing the defendants to pay N77 billion as
compensation and another N500 million as damages for allegedly using their idea
without giving credits.
In the statement of claim, the 1st plaintiff (Obekpa) avered
that “he and his team which includes the 2nd plaintiff came up with an
innovative and novel I-voting system that will ensure free, fair and credible
elections for sustainable democracy in Nigeria as far back as 2010”.
He claimed that the “I-voting system proposal was conceived
by him to ensure that valid votes cast in any elections in Nigeria are not
altered or eliminated from the final tally, while invalid votes are also not
allowed or counted in the final tally by unscrupulous elements who aid
desperate politicians to rig elections”.
Obekpa said he flew to Nigeria to meet with Atahiru Jega,
former INEC chairman, and they discussed his proposal.
The plaintiffs claim to have deployed resources, both
financial and human, to create and design the I-voting proposal for INEC in
2010.
They claim that it is their proposal that has now been
christened as BVAS and IREV.
“At the trial, the plaintiffs shall also demonstrate that
the INEC Result Viewing Portal (IREV) was their content proposal to the 1st
defendant in 2010,” the plaintiffs said.
“The plaintiffs aver that they retain the exclusive and
assignable legal right to the I-voting proposal to INEC document as the
originators of the same.
“It is averred by the plaintiffs that the 1st defendant
deliberately suppressed the I-voting proposal which they submitted to it by not
reaching out to them in other to take sole credit for the same.”
Consequently, they are praying the court for a declaration
that the I-voting proposal is the same as the BVAS and IREV.
They also want the court to direct the federal government
“to publicly recognize and acknowledge the plaintiffs and their team who were
involved in the preparation and design of the I-voting proposal to the 1st
defendant since 2010”.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com