The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) says it
wants to see more prosecutions of “high-profile figures” sponsoring electoral
offences.
Mahmood Yakubu, chairman of INEC, said this on Tuesday at a
public hearing organised by the house of representatives committee on electoral
matters for a bill to establish the National Electoral Offences Commission.
Yakubu said the reform of the nation’s electoral process
cannot achieve its desired results without the “effective sanctions” of
violators.
“The bill for an act to establish the National Electoral
Offences Commission is critical legislation. It has been part of all national
conversations on constitutional and electoral reforms for the last 13 years,”
he said.
“It is clear that the reform of our electoral process cannot
be complete without effective sanctions on violators of our laws. At present,
INEC is saddled with the responsibility of prosecuting electoral offenders
under the Electoral Act. This has been very challenging for the commission. For
instance, since the 2015 general election, 125 cases of electoral offences were
filed in various courts out of which 60 convictions have been secured so far,
including the most recent one in Akwa Ibom state.
“The commission would like to see more successful
prosecution of offenders, not just ballot box snatchers, falsifiers of election
results and vote buyers at polling units but most importantly, their sponsors.
We look forward to the day when highly placed sponsors of thuggery, including
high-profile figures that seek to benefit from these violations, are arrested
and prosecuted. We believe the work of the proposed commission will help in
this regard.
“However, much as the commission would like to see more
successful prosecution of offenders, our effort is hampered by obvious
constraints.”
Yakubu said in addition to the responsibilities of INEC
stipulated in the electoral act, the electoral umpire is required to prosecute
electoral offenders.
“However, the commission’s incapacity to arrest offenders or
conduct the investigation that leads to the successful prosecution of especially
the high-profile offenders led to the suggestion to unbundle the commission and
assign some of its extensive responsibilities to other agencies as recommended
by the Uwais and Nnamani Committees,” he said.
“For those who argue that the solution does not lie in
expanding the federal bureaucracy by creating a new commission, we believe that
the National Electoral Offences Commission should be seen as an exception.
While there are other security agencies that deal with economic and financial
crimes, I am yet to hear anyone who, in good conscience, thinks that it is
unnecessary to have established anti-corruption agencies.”
Yakubu said clause 33 (1) of the bill which confers
jurisdiction on federal, state and FCT high courts to try offenders should be
reviewed because “these courts are already over-burdened”.
He said the electoral offences tribunal should be
established with exclusive jurisdiction to try electoral offenders.
“The second is clause 44 which empowers the attorney-general
of the federation to make rules or regulations for the commission – conferring
additional power to any other body may cause friction or conflict with the
commission which should be independent in the discharge of its functions even
if doing so requires a consequential amendment to other laws of the Federation
to empower the Commission and guarantee its independence,” he added.
The bill, which has 48 clauses, passed the second reading at
the lower legislative chamber in June.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com