The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress,
Senator Abdullahi Adamu, says the recent lawsuit of the Peoples Democratic
Party calling for the disqualification of its presidential candidate, Asiwaju
Bola Tinubu, and his counterpart in Labour Party over controversy trailing the
use of placeholders cannot be justified.
A fiery Adamu said while he cannot speak on behalf of other
political platforms, the ruling party operated with the ambience of the law.
The APC chair made the clarification when he appeared on
Arise TV programme on Sunday.
The PDP had instituted a suit compelling the Independent
National Electoral Commission to prevent Tinubu and Labour Party standard
bearer, Peter Obi, from replacing their running mates with Senator Kashim
Shettima and Senator Datti Baba-Ahmed respectively.
The opposition party asked the court to disqualify Tinubu
and Obi unless they contest alongside their previous running mates – Kabiru
Masari and Doyin Okupe respectively.
While Tinubu nominated Masari as a surrogate running mate to
beat the June 17 INEC deadline, Obi also elected his campaign manager, Okupe as
a placeholder.
In the originating summons with suit number
FHC/ABJ/CS/1016/2022, the PDP is seeking an order barring the Independent
National Electoral Commission from replacing the running mates of Tinubu and
Obi.
Those listed as first to seventh respondents in the case
were INEC, APC, Tinubu, Masari, Labour Party, Obi and Okupe.
The PDP asked the court to determine if by the combined
interpretation of Section 142(1) of the constitution, Section 29(1), 31 and 33
of the Electoral Act 2022, and INEC’s timetable, Tinubu and Obi are bound by
the submission of Masari and Okupe respectively as their running mates.
The party asked the court to rule that both Tinubu and Obi
will be disqualified the moment they substitute the names of their running
mates.
However, candidates of both APC and LP defied the legal
proceedings and have since replaced the placeholders with Shettima and
Baba-Ahmed respectively.
Defending the APC’s action, Adamu maintained that they
operated with the dictates of the electoral law, adding that as a legal
practitioner, he won’t comment much on the case because it is subjudice.
He stated, “The laws of this land are absolutely clear. No
matter how mischievous anyone of us wants to be, there is the law. As far as
the APC is concerned, we had a convention where a candidate was chosen for an
election.
“Within the legal space available to us and to give us room
to assess the candidates that will be desirous for our running mate or vice
presidential candidate, we had to submit a name that will hold the position for
our nomination. The laws of INEC do allow for this. If it doesn’t, we won’t
contemplate.
“It is within the confine and dictates of our electoral laws
in this country. It is not something to lose sleep over. We now have a running
mate that we have submitted to the INEC. Simple! If you say the PDP has gone to
court, let the court decides on the case. It is subjudice anyway.
“For your information, I am a lawyer by my calling. Once a case is in court, it is subjudice. I don’t want to comment on it and I won’t do it beyond what I have just told you now.”
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everydayAdvertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com