Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, presidential candidate of the
Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), says his proposal to privatisate the
Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN), refineries and the rail sector, is to
promote growth and efficiency.
He said this in a statement issued on Tuesday by Paul Ibe,
his media aide.
The development comes hours after the National Union of
Electricity Employees (NUEE), in a statement, rejected Abubakar’s agenda on
deregulation.
According to a statement issued on Monday by Joe Ajaero,
NUEE general secretary, the proposal by the PDP candidate will be
counter-productive, conserdering past experiences.
“Alhaji Abubakar
Atiku was the Chairman of the National Council on Privatisation (NCP), a
government committee entrusted with the responsibility of managing the
privatisation programme initiated by the Olusegun Obasanjo administration to
handle the disposal of public enterprises,” Ajaero said.
“Of the over 60 enterprises privatised when he became NCP
Chairman in 1999, how many of them are functioning optimally? From the Osogbo
Steel rolling mill which has become a glorified warehouse to the abysmal
performances of the privatised Generation Companies (GenCos) and Distribution
Companies (DisCos) over eight (8) years after privatisation.”
Responding in a statement by his media aide, Atiku
maintained that the proposal on privatisation is in the interest of ensuring
sustainable growth.
“It is important to emphasise that actively promoting
private sector participation in infrastructure development will be beneficial
to the economy. It is also inevitable that we incentivise the private sector to
take risk and invest in the economy for the following reasons,” the statement
reads.
“There is no telling that Nigeria’s huge infrastructure
deficit is making businesses uncompetitive and stunting economic growth. The
supply of efficient infrastructure, including roads and rail transportation,
communication, adequate power etcetera is extremely important for the economy
to grow and create much-needed jobs.
“Therefore, to build the economy of our dreams, we must
increase the stock and improve the quality of our infrastructure. Inadequate
infrastructure has been identified as the most problematic factor for doing
business in Nigeria.
“In terms of actual spending, Nigeria currently spends less
than 1% of its annual GDP on infrastructure as against the required levels of
between 3%-5% of annual GDP. This shortfall has created a deficit, estimated at
USD 3 Trillion over the next 30 years.
“Our overwhelmed public sector does not have the resources
or expertise to deliver. While our financing requirement is approximately 100
billion USD per annum, Nigeria’s entire budget is only USD 30 billion. The
National Development Plan envisages that 80% of all investments will come from
the private sector.
“Regrettably, Nigeria’s core infrastructure sectors are not
operating efficiently. Almost all the infrastructure sectors from roads,
railways, housing, power, and energy are operating below potential. Over the
years, we have observed how these enterprises consume huge public resources
while offering poor quality services. Many of these State-owned Enterprises have
become a source for political patronage, corruption, and rent seeking to the
detriment of Nigeria’s long-term economic growth.
“For example, Nigeria’s refining infrastructure remains poor
despite the perennial injection of unending public resources for turnaround
maintenance. The country’s refining capacity per capita is 0.002 bpd/capita
compared to Libya’s 0.06 bpd/capita and South Africa’s 0.01 bpd/capita. As of
today, Nigeria imports over 80% of its refined products to meet its current
needs and is said to be the largest importer of PMS in the world, with
significant balance of trade implications.
“Sadly, the fiscal cost of maintaining these State-Owned
Enterprises is enormous, and it comes with even greater opportunity costs. By
holding unto these underperforming enterprises, Nigeria is sacrificing
investments in critical areas, including education, health, water, sanitation,
and rural infrastructure.”
He also said the cost of rehabilitating refineries,
“expected to gulp US$1.55 billion” in the first phase is “huge”, adding that
Nigeria cannot afford such funding, considering “its current precarious fiscal
position and daunting development challenges”.
According to him, while the Bureau of Public Enterprises
(BPE) lists “67% of the 142 privatised firms” as performing, there are still
many benefits to be derived from privatisation as seen in the
telecommunications sector.
“Liberalised firms may face difficulties as they transit
from the old culture of rent seeking and dependence on government for survival,
to a new business culture that is driven by efficiency and competition. But
Atiku Abubakar will ensure that his economic reform measures are accompanied by
a series of mutually supportive activities aimed at easing these difficulties and
making the reform measures impactful,” the statement reads.
“Finally, we shall not hold brief for the BPE, as they are
best suited to answer some of the questions raised by NUEE for example, who
bought the companies and what process was followed, etcetera.”
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com