The National Judicial Council (NJC) has issued new
guidelines on political and election-related cases.
The council, in a statement issued on Wednesday, said the
document is part of its efforts to address issues of conflicting orders and
judgments.
The development comes amid concerns over conflicting court
judgments on political cases.
In August 2021, Ibrahim Muhammad, the chief justice of
Nigeria (CJN), had summoned six judges explain their recent court orders.
Weeks before the summons, the chief judges had issued
conflicting orders on issues bordering on the chairmanship tussle of the
Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the gubernatorial candidate logjam of the
All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) in Anambra state.
Days after the summons, the CJN had asked three of the
judges to appear before the NJC to show cause why disciplinary action should
not be taken against them for granting the conflicting ex parte orders.
There have also been conflicting court orders in recent
weeks over issues around elective office holders who defected from the parties
under which they were elected, as well as section 84(12) of the Electoral Act
2022.
According to the statement on Wednesday, the policy
guidelines were discussed during the NJC’s 98th meeting presided over by CJN.
“These policy directions shall apply to all suits filed in
any court in Nigeria wherein the parties include Independent National Electoral
Commission (INEC), any political party or its officers, any other person,
natural or legal, suing or sued for a declaration in relation to any action
taken or to compel or restrain any action or omission with respect to the
affairs of a political party or any election into a public office,” the
statement issued by Soji Oye, NJC spokesman, reads.
Oye also said the guidelines will be in use “pending the
constitution of a Cross Jurisdiction Litigation Panel (CJLP) to give directions
on appropriate litigation for a for cross jurisdiction litigations”.
The new guidelines make recommendations on filing of
election matters, as well as steps to be taken on rulings requiring appeal.
“All suits to which
these Policy Directions apply shall be filed, received, or entertained only at
the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory in so far as the relief sought,
or potential consequential order(s) or declaration(s) may restrain or compel persons
or actions beyond the territorial jurisdiction of any one State,” the statement
reads.
“Where such suits are within the exclusive jurisdiction of
the Federal High Court, they shall be filed or received at Abuja and assigned
by the Chief Judge of the Court.
“All such Suits wherein the cause of action arose in a State
and the relief seeks a declaration or to compel or restrain person(s), natural
or legal, within that State’s territory, with no consequence outside the State,
shall be filed, received, or heard only in that State.
“All Heads of Court shall assign cases or constitute panels
with a view to forestalling the incidences of conflicting judgements and
rulings.
“Once facts or issues
have been ruled upon, no other Court or Panel of Coordinate Jurisdiction shall
be assigned or entertain Suits on the same subject matter and parties shall
comply or proceed on appeal to the appropriate higher Court.
“Rules of Court shall require sufficient notice and
publicity of actions that potentially impact other cases.
“Rules of Court shall
stipulate solemn disclosure duties on litigants filing actions that may impact
other actions.
“Heads of Court shall exercise their rule making and
administrative powers to give effect to these Policy Directions.”
The guidelines take effect from May 11.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com