Itse Sagay, chairman of the presidential advisory committee
against corruption (PACAC), says most of the items proposed by the national
assembly as amendments to the 1999 constitution are “totally irrelevant” to the
country’s immediate needs.
On Tuesday, the national assembly commenced voting process
on the alteration to some sections of the 1999 constitution.
At the plenary, the national assembly voted on the bills
seeking to give special seats to women as lawmakers, financial autonomy for
LGAs, immunity for senate president and speaker, diaspora voting, among others.
The national assembly voted on 68 bills at Tuesday’s
plenary.
Speaking on the development on Tuesday, Sagay, in an
interview on Channels Television, said the lawmakers should have address the
question of restructuring.
“I have gone through most of the items which the national
assembly has taken up and unfortunately, it has conformed with what I have felt
about their modifications of the constitution,” he said.
“They are totally irrelevant to our needs at the moment.
What is necessary and what is causing a lot of problems in the country is the
question of restructuring — the question of having a true federalism. They have
not touched that at all.
“If I may give an example of what I’m talking about, we
should be talking of funding formula for the federation. There should be no
federation account.
“We should retain the provisions of the 1963 constitution
under which regions, now states, retained 50 percent of its resources, sent 20
percent to the federal government, and sent 30 percent to a distributable pool
— to be distributed among the states of the federation in accordance with your
level of sufficiency in terms of provisions.
“Under the distributable pool, the least able state — the
poorest state — gets more from that pool. Every state, even the rich ones, also
gets some. Under that formula, 50 for the state, 20 for the federal government,
30 to the distributable pool.
‘I noticed that a lot of attention was spent on issues that
are totally irrelevant with regards to the local government. We should not be
talking about local government in the constitution.
“What they should discuss is total removal of the provisions
of the local government from the constitution. The constitution shouldn’t tell
us what we should do about our local governments. It should not contain a list
of our local governments.
“Local government is a state matter. 100 percent, it is a
state matter. It has nothing to do with the federal government.
“When you talk about funding of local governments — how to
create a special account for LG separate from the state governments — they are
irrelevant; it shouldn’t be in the constitution at all.”
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com