A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, has said
that Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, should not have openly
confronted a Chief Superintendent of Police at the Magodo Phase 2 Estate area
of the state because of constitutional limitations.
According to the senior lawyer, the encounter between the
governor and the police officer was a clarion call to the need for
restructuring and state policing.
Recall that the CSP, Abimbola
Oyewole, on Tuesday openly defied Sanwo-Olu’s order to vacate Magodo Phase 2
Estate.
The CSP told the governor that he and his armed colleagues
were at the estate on the orders of the Inspector-General of Police, Usman
Baba; as well as the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN).
Sanwo-Olu had led members of his cabinet to visit the
residents protesting the continuous presence of armed policemen in the estate.
For days, policemen besieged the estate in the company of
suspected land grabbers and members of a family who had planned to demolish
property in the choice estate to execute a Supreme Court judgment. The
development caused commotion at the estate as landlords and tenants panic over
their fate.
Addressing the CSP before journalists, Sanwo-Olu said, “Can
you call your superiors in Abuja and tell them that the governor is here and as
the Chief Security Officer, you don’t have any business being in my state right
now and that I want you to disengage right now?”
But Oyewole replied, “I am here on the instruction of the
Inspector General of Police through the AGF. I am too small or too low to call
them. Your Excellency sir, you can call them sir.”
In a chat with our correspondent, Adegboruwa said the
governor was not well-advised and shouldn’t have made such public appeal to
sentiments knowing that the police weren’t under his control.
The senior lawyer said, “In a federation, the governor
should have complete territorial control of the state where he has been elected
to govern. The difference between the governor and the Chief Superintendent of
Police is in the mandate of the people; the governor was elected as the
representative of the people whereas the police officer is part of the servant
and people who serve the collective aspirations of our people.
“To that extent, it
should not have been openly possible for us to have a situation where in the
public glare the police defy the chief public officer of the state.
“I believe that the governor was not well-advised to embark
on open confrontation with the police knowing the constitutional limitations
that hinder his directives or operational instructions to police officers who
are not directly under him.
“There should have been caution on both sides; there ought
not to have been an open confrontation between the governor and the police
because these are issues we have known since 1999 that the constitution has
more or less stripped the governors of any powers in terms of control of
security. So, to make such appeals to sentiments was not totally commended on
the part of his excellency, with all due respect.
“But having said that, it addresses the need for us to rejig
the constitution and work out a proper Federation. I do not support in any case
that the governor should be helpless in containing crisis in a state.”
“The 1999 Constitution tells a lie against the people of
Nigeria when it claims that we are running a Federation but strips the Governor
of a State of powers over security.
“In the final analysis, only restructuring can save this
nation. Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable,”
he added.
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com