Ajibola Basiru, spokesperson of the senate, says the
argument of President Muhammadu Buhari on the issue of cost of direct primary
in the electoral act amendment bill is “totally fallacious”.
On November 19, the electoral bill was transmitted to Buhari
for assent.
Compulsory direct primaries for political parties and
electronic transmission of election results are among the amendments proposed
by the national assembly.
But Buhari rejected the bill on the grounds of insecurity
and cost of conducting direct primaries, adding that the recommendation
“violates the spirit of democracy”.
Speaking on the development, Basiru, in an interview on
Channels Television on Tuesday, said the national assembly can explore four
options following the rejection of the bill.
Highlighting the four options, he said the national assembly
can discard the bill like the eighth assembly, adjust the bill in line with the
president’s argument, remove the provision of direct primary, or override the
president.
The senate spokesperson said the option of discarding the
bill in its entirety cannot be a “compelling reason” for the national assembly,
owing to the provisions in the proposed law.
“Those are the four options before the national assembly.
And I believe the national assembly, at the fullest of time, will be able to
take those options,” he said.
“It is very important to say that as members of the national
assembly, we are approaching this issue not out of any sense of egotism or any
sense of power tussle with anybody.
“But we will consider it based on counter arguments that may
be canvassed against whatever reasons the president had given.
“For instance, the argument on the cost that had been raised
by Mr president, with respect, is presumptuous and totally fallacious. There is
nothing that is given that primary election must be conducted on a ward basis;
it could as well be conducted either on a quarterly basis or on a local
government basis.
“As regards argument
on smaller political parties, smaller political parties may decide to even
organise their direct primary at the state level.
“On the issue of security, an extension of that argument will be that because we have security challenges, then we should not even hold the 2023 elections; this is if we want to use what logicians called reductio ad absurdum, that is reducing the argument to the level of absurdity.”
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everydayAdvertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com