There was rowdiness on Thursday during a house of
representatives public hearing as Uzoma Abonta, a member from Abia, accused his
colleague, Buba Yakub, from Adamawa, of plagiarising his bill.
The public hearing was organised by the house committees on
anti-corruption and commerce to look into the bill to establish the ‘Chartered
Institute of Forensics and Certified Fraud Examiners’.
The bill, sponsored by Yakub, passed the first and second
reading in March and April respectively.
Abonta(pictured) had earlier sponsored the ‘Chartered Institute of Forensic and Investigative Professional of Nigeria’ bill and it was passed by the house — but yet to be assented to by President Muhammadu Buhari.
Speaking at the hearing, Abonta said the provisions of
Yakub’s bill are not different from the one he sponsored.
Abonta said: “We have rules we follow in the national
assembly. National assembly is a hallow chamber, we don’t have to cause
confusion — we solve confusion.
“What is now surprising now is that this bill now being
considered… I authored the other forensic bill. This bill is word for word with
the bill I authored. That is plagiarism.”
At this point, Abonta was interrupted by Yakub who raised a
point of order.
Benjamin Sekpe, legal adviser to the Chartered Institute of
Forensic and Investigative Professionals, while making his presentation, said
the “bill is a photocopy”.
“We only got to know about this public hearing this morning
that is why we are unable to make proper presentation and submission,” he said.
“May I bring to the attention of the committee that a bill
to establish the Chartered Institute of Forensic and Investigative
Professionals of Nigeria was passed into law by this same house on the 19th day
of May 2021 and what is surprising is the fact that the bill under public
hearing at the moment is more or less a photocopy of our bill.”
He was interrupted by Yakub who raised another point of
order, again denying the allegation of plagiarism.
Yakub demanded that Sekpe be placed under oath before
continuing with the presentation.
He said: “Point of order Mr chairman. Mr. chairman, I will
not sit here to take such an insult. My bill is entirely a different bill and
then, you cannot come here to say my bill is similar to what it is… Mr
chairman, you have to take up the matter. It is a serious matter.
“This bill has gone through the first reading, has gone
through second reading in the house, this is the public hearing. So he should
be put on oath before he makes his speech so that whatever he said, he should
be held accountable for it.”
The committee, however, allowed Sekpe to continue with his
presentation.
Sekpe said: “The bill that is under public hearing today is
more like a rehash of our bill. If the house may take note, the same bill was
passed by the eighth assembly but due to gray arrears, the president could not
assent to the bill and the bill came back and it was passed by this same
house.”
He added that allowing the bill to be passed will be a
“duplication and multiplication of law”.
Following his presentation, the house committee ruled that
the allegation will be looked into.
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com