The court of appeal
in Abuja has discharged and acquitted Raymond Dokpesi, former chairman of Daar
Communications PLC, of corruption allegations.
Dokpesi and his company, DAAR Investment and Holdings Ltd,
were arraigned on a seven-count charge bordering on alleged procurement fraud
and breach of public trust.
He is alleged to have received N2.1 billion from the office
of the national security adviser (ONSA) between October 2014 and March 2015,
during the tenure of Sambo Dasuki, former national security adviser, for
services not rendered.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had called 13 witnesses in the course of the trial.
On November 21, 2018, John Tsoho, trial judge, had struck out Dokpesi’s no-case submission and
ordered him to open his defence.
Aggrieved, Dokpesi approached the court of appeal seeking to
upturn the trial court’s decision.
Elfrieda Williams-Dawodu, justice of the appellate court,
delivered judgment in the appeal on Thursday.
The judge held that the prosecution failed to establish a
prima facie case against the appellants.
“I am of the view that irrespective of the ingredients
stated earlier and those by the appellants and the first respondent
respectively, prior proof or establishment of the predicate offences in count
1, 2, 3 and 4 of the amended charge is sine qua non to the proof of the
offences of money laundering specified in the said count,” she said.
“The predicate offence is an earlier offence upon which the
offence being tried is based.
“The first respondent has woefully failed to show a prior
establishment of the predicate offences in this case.
“Also, there is
evidence to prove the conduct of the appellant and his lifestyle because that
is another way of proving or establishing money laundering.
“As can be seen from the evidence on record, the first respondent
has been unable to prove the predicate offences.
“It is clear that none of the offences was proven or
established.
“The law is trite that the initial burden is on the
prosecution to establish a prima facie case against the defendant before the pendulum
will swing to the defendant to make his defence.”
She said the prosecution also failed to prove that the money
received by the defendants was a “proceed of criminal breach of trust”.
The judge added that no case was made against the appellants
to warrant them to enter their defence.
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com