Wahab Shittu, counsel to Ibrahim Magu, suspended chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), says his client is incorruptible.
Reacting to the submission of
report by the presidential panel which probed Magu, Shittu said his client will
be vindicated.
President Muhammadu Buhari
received the report of the panel led by Ayo Salami, retired president of the
court of appeal, on Friday.
In its report, the panel asked
Buhari to sack Magu and appoint a new EFCC chairman in an interim position for
two years.
It also recommended that Buhari
should look outside the police force in appointing the next chairman.
In a statement, Shittu said the
panel’s recommendations are outside its mandate, adding that separating EFCC
from the police will be anti-law enforcement.
The lawyer said Magu will be vindicated, adding that the ex-EFCC boss remains incorruptible.
“We wish to state that in view of
today’s submission of the much awaited report of Justice Isa Salami – led
Judicial Commission of Enquiry to President Muhammadu Buhari, we wish to state
with high sense of responsibility that the suspended Acting Chairman of the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr Ibrahim Magu, will be
vindicated at the end of the day,” the statement read.
“We observed that Hon Justice Isa
Salami, in a televised speech at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, made certain
recommendations outside the mandate of the panel and proceeded to make case for
the headship of the commission outside the Police Force. We wish to state that
all over the world, the police is central to law enforcement. The EFCC is a law
enforcement agency, separating the police from the EFCC is anti- law
enforcement.”
Below is his full statement.
We wish to state that in view of
today’s submission of the much awaited report of Justice Isa Salami – led
Judicial Commission of Enquiry to President Muhammadu Buhari, we wish to state
with high sense of responsibility that the suspended Acting Chairman of the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr Ibrahim Magu, will be
vindicated at the end of the day.
We observed that Hon Justice Isa
Salami, in a televised speech at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, made certain
recommendations outside the mandate of the panel and proceeded to make case for
the headship of the commission outside the Police Force.
We wish to state that all over
the world, the police is central to law enforcement. The EFCC is a law
enforcement agency, separating the police from the EFCC is anti- law
enforcement.
How come that Salami Panel did
not say anything on alleged mismanagement recovered assets, insubordination and
abuse of office against Mr Magu?
We are further alarmed that
Salami could in the public glare at the seat of power, attacked the police as
an institution and recommended the exit of police officers from the EFCC within
two years.
We wish to ask at this juncture-
what happened to the huge amount of money expended by the Federal Government on
these police officers in terms of investigations, money laundering and
specialized economic
crimes.
Without preempting President
Muhammadu Buhari on his decision over the report, we urge the President to make
inform decision and do the needful on the matter.
We also wish to state with high
sense of responsibility that Magu remains incorruptible and his stellar
achievements in EFCC is unprecedented in the history of the commission
We are further urging the general
public to take note of these salient points:
*Mr Magu did not collect any
bribe from anybody as we insist that all allegations of diversion of recovered
assets leveled against our client were baseless and unfounded.
*Please note that Magu is
innocent of all the allegations leveled against him.
*The forfeited assets and the
proposed sale is the main reason they are pushing for his removal from EFCC.
*Powerful government officials
are not comfortable with Mr Magu’s incorruptible style of leadership. They
prefer somebody they can manipulate.
* There is no doubt that Mr Magu
must have stepped on powerful toes in the course of doing his job.
*Salami Panel was mandated to sit
for 45 days but ended up sitting for about 6 months.
We also anchor our position in
view of the following incontrovertible facts:
In the past, many false stories
against Magu had featured in the public space only for such unfounded
allegations to collapse like pack of cards during the proceedings of the Salami
panel. These false allegations include:
NFIU Alleged N573million Property
in Dubai
• The reported inflow of
N573million into the account of Pastor Emmanuel Omale’s church allegedly used
to purchase property in Dubai for Magu was shown to be false during the
proceedings. For the avoidance of doubt, the FCMB publicly confirmed through
press statements and advertorials that there was an error entry and apologized
during the proceedings.
No Link of Laundered Funds by
Pastor Omale on Behalf of Magu
• It was not established that
Pastor Emmanuel Omale laundered any funds for Magu.
No Evidence of Diversion or
Illegal Sale of Forfeited Assets.
• It was not established that
Magu sold, converted or diverted any of the forfeited assets to anyone.
No Link of Laundered Funds by BDC
Operators traced to Magu
• All the BDC operators including
the Shanono brothers denied any business or financial links with Magu during
the proceedings and no such evidence was found. In the proceedings, Magu’s
alleged links to the BDC operators and money laundering as contained in the
NFIU report and PCARA reports collapsed like a pack of cards.
No Link of Laundered Funds by
Vice President Yemi Osinbajo (SAN) and Femi Falana SAN traced to Magu
• There is no proof that Vice
President Yemi Osinbajo (SAN) Femi Falana SAN or any other person laundered funds
on behalf of Magu
No Allegation of Bribery
Established Against Magu
• There is no proof of allegation
of bribery established against Magu throughout the proceedings
No Proof that Funds in the TSA
account with CBN missing
• The CBN confirmed that all
recovered funds were lodged in the TSA account with CBN and details of such
funds were furnished to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry by the CBN.
No Interest on Funds lodged in
TSA Account with CBN
• The Accountant-General of the
Federation confirmed that funds kept in TSA account with CBN do not generate
interest and as such no interest on funds lodged in TSA account was capable of
being diverted.
Security Votes
• Although the Judicial
Commission of Inquiry took up issues with Magu on security votes, this was
adequately explained by Magu that such funds were utilized for operational and
intelligence purposes with receipts of expenditure provided in the appropriate
cases.
• Details of Recovered Assets
across the EFCC Zones furnished to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry
• Details of Forfeited Vessels
furnished to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry by the Nigerian Navy
• Details of Assets forfeited to
the Federal Government by Mrs Diezani Allison- Maduekwe and associates intact
and furnished to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry
• Allegation of N75million
alleged traced to Magu boys proven to be false before the Judicial Commission
of Inquiry
• No allegation of purchase of
N750million property belonging to Late Ojo Maduekwe’s Estate traced to Magu.
Saleh Ahmadu who bought the property confirmed he has no links to Magu.
Biased Constitution Of The
Judicial Commission Of Inquiry
As admitted by the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation Mr. Abubakar Malami (SAN) the allegations leading to the establishment of the judicial commission of inquiry, was as a result of reports from law enforcement and security an agency. Notwithstanding the above, membership of the judicial commission of inquiry was constituted mainly by our client’s accusers including membership of the office of the AGF , thereby raising significant issues of fair hearing against our client.
The membership of the judicial commission of inquiry are as follows:
a. Justice Ayo Isa Salami (rtd),
former PCA, North-Central, Chairman
b. DIG Anthony Ogbizi Michael
(NPF)- South-South, Deputy Chairman
c. Muhammad Abubakar Babadoko-
Federal Ministry of Justice (North Central)
d. Hassan Yahaya Abdulahi (DSS)
(North Central)
e. Muhammad Shamsudeen (OAGF)
(North West)
f. Douglas Egweme (NFIU), (South
East)
g. Kazeem Attitebi (South-West),
Secretary.
Professor Itse Sagay’s Position
on the panel’s composition.
The Chairman, Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof Itse Sagay SAN, has also faulted the composition of the judicial commission of inquiry on the ground of bias as follows;
“I criticize the Salami Panel for
taking evidence from the accusers behind Magu’s back and for not giving him the
petitions against him in advance of his defence. Also from the report we read,
the panel is packed with representatives of DSS, Ministry of Justice and others
from security agencies, these are also his accusers”
The HAGF Mr. Abubakar Malami SAN
is aware that this composition breaches fair hearing as decided by settled
authorities including LPDC V FAWEHINMI (1985) NWLR Pt.7 300.
It is instructive to state that
the memo of AGF Malami SAN to Mr President including the letter addressed to
the President from NFIU triggered the establishment of the judicial commission
of inquiry, thereby making AGF Malami SAN as the main accuser of our client for
alleged corrupt enrichment amongst several other allegations.
Regrettably and shockingly
inspite of public assurances by Mr Abubakar Malami SAN to appear before the
judicial commission of inquiry to testify and notwithstanding issuance of
subpoena on the HAGF by the commission of inquiry to testify, the HAGF Mr.
Abubakar Malami SAN refused to appear to justify the serious allegations of
corrupt enrichment leveled against our client.
The HAGF failed to justify the
allegations against our client contrary to the principle that “He who asserts
must prove” The Chief Law Officer of the Federation defied the law by failing
to appear to valid summons issued by the judicial commission of inquiry.
In specific terms, there was no
evidence linking our client with the following allegations:
• Absence Of Proof Of Allegations Of Corrupt Enrichment Against
Magu
• Lack of evidence of corrupt
enrichment against Magu
• NFIU Alleged N573million
Property in Dubai
• No Evidence of Diversion or
Illegal Sale of Forfeited Assets.
• No Link of Laundered Funds by
Pastor Omale on Behalf of our Client
• No Link of Laundered Funds by
BDC Operators traced to our client
• No Link of Laundered Funds by
Femi Falana SAN traced to our client
• No Allegation of Bribery
Established Against our Client
• No Proof that Funds in the TSA
account with CBN missing
• No Interest on Funds lodged in
TSA Account with CBN
The following details were
obliged to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry directly from the relevant
quarters during the proceedings.
• Details of recovered funds in
TSA Accounts furnished to the commission by the CBN
• Details of Recovered Assets
across the EFCC Zones furnished to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry
• Details of Forfeited Vessels
furnished to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry.
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com