The Global Integrity Crusade
Network has given comprehensive and cogent reasons the Islamic Movement in
Nigeria, IMN, should be proscribed and labeled a national terrorist
organisation.
The group, in a letter addressed
to the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar
Malami, gave 21 reasons the ministry should act fast and outlaw the group for
constituting nuisance in the country.
This call is coming barely one
week after another civil society organisation, the Coalition for Nigeria, had
called on the Nigerian government to outlaw the Islamic Movement in Nigeria,
IMN, saying that Iran was discreetly breeding another terrorism sect in Nigeria
through IMN extremists.
The Global Integrity Crusade
Network in a letter signed Bashorun Oladokun Abdulwajeed, Director of Special
Duties, which was copied to President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR, the
Director-General, Department of State Services (DSS) and the Inspector-General
of Police, claimed that the IMN has been linked to recruitment of members of
foreign terrorist groups such as the Islamic States (ISIS), Al-Qaeda,
Al-Shabaab, and so on, contrary to Section 10 of the Terrorism (Prevention)
(Amendment) Act, 2013 and should not be allowed to operate in Nigeria.
The letter is titled: “21 REASONS
WHY YOUR OFFICE MUST URGENTLY DESIGNATE THE DREADED ISLAMIC MOVEMENT IN NIGERIA
(IMN) AS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION IN LINE WITH THE KADUNA STATE WHITE PAPER ON
ZARIA CLASHES OF DECEMBER 2015.”
It reads: “We at Global Integrity
Crusade Network (GICN) have keenly monitored activities of the Islamic Movement
in Nigeria (IMN) otherwise known as Shiites within the past few weeks and note
with bitterness that members of the organization have continued to breach
national peace, cause mayhem and make life unbearable for innocent citizens,
especially in the Federal Capital Territory Abuja and its environs.
“Only on Wednesday, April 24,
2019 members of IMN numbering in their thousands, clothed with intimidating
regalia and chanting war songs barricaded the main entrance leading to the
National Assembly Complex, thereby obstructing vehicular movement and legislative
activities for the day. There is no doubt that IMN is hell bent on sustaining
this kind of violent protests in the city of Abuja under the guise of
“demanding” for the release of their acclaimed leader, Sheikh Ibraheem
El-Zakzaky who has been in protective custody and is presently facing criminal
prosecution before the High Court of Kaduna State. It therefore follows that
unless and until something tangible is done to exterminate the group at once,
the much anticipated peace in the North and Nigeria as a whole will remain an
illusion.
“Recall that following the clash
that occurred between IMN and the Nigerian Army in Zaria, Kaduna State between
December 12 and 14, 2015, Governor Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai, pursuant to the powers
vested on him by Section 2 (1) of the Commission of Inquiry Law, Cap 34, Laws
of Kaduna State, 1991 set up the 13 member Judicial Commission of Inquiry
headed by Honourable Justice Muhammed Lawal Garba, JCA with a defined Terms of
Reference (TOR). The Judicial Commission of Inquiry which examined, amongst
other issues, the immediate and remote causes of the aforesaid clash, submitted
its report in July 2016. Thereafter, the Kaduna State Government made the
report public within ten days and set up a committee of senior public servants,
which eventually prepared a draft White Paper that was later reviewed, amended
approved by the Kaduna State Executive Council. Our careful perusal of the
White Paper reveals that it captures the views and decisions of the government
on all the recommendations made to it by the Judicial Commission of Inquiry.
“We note that all recommendations
pertaining to the Federal Ministry of Justice were referred to your office for
appropriate consideration and action, particularly with regard to prosecution
of certain offenders and designating IMN as a terrorist group that it truly is.
“We, like other well-meaning
Nigerians, are worried that after over two years of receipt of the White Paper,
your office has not deemed it fit to take decisive actions against IMN despite
the fact that the group, which has already been outlawed by Kaduna State
Government, would stop at nothing to destabilize our dear country. It is
against this backdrop that we hereby write to give you 21 reasons why you must
not delay further in using the sledge hammer by labelling IMN as a terrorist
organization and causing it to face the attendant consequences of being so
labelled according to the extant laws of the land. The said 21 reasons are as
stated below: –
“1. That IMN is not a registered
organization at the Corporate Affairs Commission under Part C of the Companies
and Allied Matters Act, CAP C20, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004. This
implies that it cannot be sued, tried or convicted as an entity for crimes
committed by its members and has no basis to exist in Nigeria.
“2. That IMN has never ceased to
be a violent organization as deduced from the wealth of oral and documentary
evidence made available to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry.
“3. That the December 2015 clash
reveals caches of arms and ammunitions purported to have been procured by IMN
with the backing of Islamic Republic of Iran and Lebanon, hence the need to ban
the organization.
“4. That IMN has built a
leadership since the past three decades that has been steadfast and deliberate
in habitual acts of lawlessness and defiance of constituted authorities in
Nigeria.
“5. That Sheikh Ibraheem
El-Zakzaky being the overall temporal and spiritual leader of IMN was notorious
to be in constant clash with all the successive governments of Nigeria from
Shagari through Buhari (as Military Head of State), Babangida to Abacha and
throughout the 4th Republic.
“6. That Sheikh Ibraheem
El-Zakzaky believes from the beginning and probably would never change his
mindset that there is no peaceful way for Muslims to attain their need for
Sharia implementation so that Nigeria solely receives commandments from Allah.
This belief is unbecoming, evil and unacceptable in the light of Section 10 of
1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) which clearly
stipulates to the effect that Nigeria operates a secular system and the
Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as
State Religion.
“7. That IMN has by its
activities and characters brazenly breached Section 1 Subsection (1) of the
Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013 through commission of acts of
terrorism and financing of terrorism.
“8. That El-Zakzaky has been
arranging, managing and participating in meetings alongside members of IMN
which in his knowledge are connected with terrorism. This offence is punishable
pursuant to Section 4 of the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013 which
prescribes imprisonment for a term not less than 20 years.
“9. That El-Zakzaky receives
funds from the Islamic Republic of Iran, Lebanon, Ghana and Niger Republic
which he channels into rendering all manners of support to his followers. He
also distributes Islamic literatures, proliferates arms and light weapons as
well as incites members of IMN to commit terrorist acts with the aim of
dislodging the government of Nigeria contrary to Section 5 of the Terrorism
(Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013 and punishable upon conviction for a term
not less than 20 years.
“10. That there are overwhelming
evidence from recent activities of IMN to show that the group is a law unto
itself. Members of IMN are fond of confronting law enforcement agencies in
order to rescue any of its members arrested or kept in custody in connection
with acts of terrorism. This is a clear breach of Section 6 the Terrorism
(Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013 and the offence attracts imprisonment for a
term not less than 20 years.
“11. That Sheikh El-Zakzaky is
notorious for training his guards popularly called Hurras in the practice of
military exercise and in the making or use of explosives and other forms of
lethal weapons without being authorized under the Nigerian laws to do so. This
constitutes an offence under Section 7 of the Terrorism (Prevention)
(Amendment) Act, 2013 and carries 20 years as punishment upon conviction.
“12. That the petrol bombs,
lethal weapons and other explosives used by members of IMN during their clash with
the Nigerian Army in Zaria, Kaduna State in December 2015 were all provided by
their most revered leader El-Zakzaky with support from foreign funders and
sympathizers. This is an offence under Section 9 of the Terrorism (Prevention)
(Amendment) Act, 2013 and is punishable with imprisonment for not less than 20
years.
“13. That IMN has been linked to
recruitment of persons to be members of foreign terrorist groups such as the
Islamic States (ISIS), Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab and so on contrary to Section 10 of
the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 2013.
“14. That the innocent citizens
of Nigeria who now live in fear of IMN are entitled to protection of their
human rights under Chapter IV of the Constitution by the Federal Government and
office of the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice should no longer condone
unlawful killings, grievous bodily harm, maiming, road blocking and destruction
of properties by IMN.
“15. That IMN has for the past 30
years operated outside the laws of Nigeria but rather chose to adopt the Funtua
Declaration as their flagship expression of the ideology of confrontation with
the Nigerian State, its legal system and security agencies.
“16. That IMN has shown by the
infractions committed since its existence that it is not different from Boko
Haram and the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), which have since been
profiled, disbanded and labelled as terrorist groups both in Nigeria and
abroad.
“17. That to avoid proscribing
IMN as a matter of urgency after so much agitation in that regard from
overwhelming population of Nigerians will send the wrong signal to other
law-abiding organizations and embolden the IMN to continue to defy all
constituted authorities.
“18. That your swift
implementation of the recommendations of the Kaduna Judicial Commission of
Inquiry as contained in the White Paper relating to proscription of IMN is key
to totally ending the menace of terrorism, incessant clashes, threat to peace,
law and order in Nigeria.
“19. That no singular individual,
group, organization or institution is above the law or bigger than the Nigerian
State as to be allowed to rebel constituted authorities in a manner that
threatens national security.
“20. That the designation of IMN
as a terrorist group will go a long way in reducing or completely dissuading
other countries from interfering in the internal affairs of Nigeria.
“21. That there are no longer
prospects of constructive engagement with the leadership of IMN, as they seem
to have made up their minds to declare war against Nigeria through sustained
violent protests and other terrorist activities.
“In conclusion, we strongly
advise that the Nigerian State should commit itself to transparency,
accountability and good governance to create within citizens a sense of
belonging to a nation that provides for their welfare and security as
stipulated under the Constitution. The State is effective in leadership if it
has legitimacy and such legitimacy itself is a function of the government
showing capacity to carry out its responsibility of providing for the public
good.
“This letter gives the
Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice yet another
opportunity to rekindle the hope of Nigerians that President Muhammadu Buhari,
GCFR in his Next Level agenda is truly ready to guarantee maximum security for
the entire country.
“No doubt, innocent Nigerians
have suffered enough in the hands of the deviant organization called IMN. It is
our expectation therefore that your office will within the next 7 (Seven)
working days from the date hereof consider the 21 reasons given above for the
proscription of IMN, make a public statement with regard thereto and take
necessary legal steps to do the needful. We hold office of the Attorney-General
of the Federation and Minister of Justice in very high esteem but will not
hesitate this time around to drag it before the court with a view to securing
an Order of Mandamus compelling it to perform its statutory duty.”
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com