Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar
Malami, on Monday told Abuja Division of the Federal High Court that the
federal government is opposed to the change in 2019 election sequence by the
National Assembly because the 1999 constitution made the actions of the
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) sacrosanct in the choice of
date for elections.
Malami, while presenting his
argument before Justice Ahmed Mohammed, said: “My lord, issues concerning the
powers of INEC to fix dates for election had long been settled by the Supreme
Court in NASS vs President, 2003, 9-NWLR, part 824, page 104.
“The 3rd defendant (INEC) has
issued and released a time table for the conduct of the 2019 election, an
action the 1st defendant (NASS) is seeking to legislate on. We submit that this
is not practicable since the action of INEC is sacrosanct having been clothed
with statutory protection.”
This was even as the NASS,
through its lead counsel, Mr. Joseph Daudu, SAN, queried the jurisdiction of
the court to stop it from securing two-third majority to override President
Muhammadu Buhari’s refusal to assent to the Electoral Act Amendment Bill, 2018,
which altered the election sequence.
However, the AGF and INEC’s
lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana, SAN, had while adopting their processes, insisted that
sections 78(1), 116, 132, 153, 178 and item 15 to the Third Schedule of the
1999 constitution, as amended, gave the electoral body unfettered discretion to
the choice of date for elections.
Falana accused the NASS of
attempting to place the Electoral Act above the constitution.
He said: “My lord what the NASS
has done is to say that four sections of the constitution that has to do with
powers of INEC to conduct/fix date for elections, be made subject to the
Amended Electoral Act.
“It is our submission that the
constitution cannot be made subject to any Act. It is unheard of. On the issue
of locus standi, we can confirm that we registered the plaintiff as Accord.
“It applied to us and all their
documents, certified, has been exhibited by the plaintiff as exhibit 4 to
8.This plaintiff was registered as Accord and it won seats, with their
representatives currently sitting in the chambers of the 1st defendant.
“It is therefore our submission
that the plaintiff has the jurisdiction to file this suit which fall under
public interest litigation.
“We urge my lord to exercise its
discretion and grant the reliefs as sought by the plaintiff. We shall however
ask for cost if they win, for bringing us here”.
After all the parties argued and
adopted their respective briefs of argument pertaining to the suit that was
filed by Accord Party, Justice Ahmed Mohammed reserved judgment for April 25,
2018.
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com