Lagos lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana, on
Tuesday described as illegal the planned prosecution of ex- President Ibrahim
Babangida’s media aide, Kassim Afegbua, over a controversial statement he
issued on behalf of the ex-President, accusing the present administration of
ineptitude, divisiveness and sectionalism.
In the statement the former
military ruler was also said to have advised President Muhammadu Buhari not to
seek re-election in 2019.
However, Babangida has disowned
the well publicised statement and the views ascribed to him by Afegbua.
Following the ex-President’s
denial, the Inspector-General of Police, Ibrahim Idris, on Monday declared
Afegbua wanted for alleged “character defamation.
But in a statement issued on
Tuesday in Lagos, Falana advised the IGP to withdraw the offensive declaration
without further delay.
The rights activist said Idris
has “over reached” himself by declaring Afegbua wanted when he has not failed
to honour the police invitation.
“It is undoubtedly that it is the
Inspector General of police who has defamed Mr. Afegbua by portraying him as a
fugitive from the law. Therefore, Mr.
Idris is advised to withdraw the offensive declaration without any further
delay,” Falana stated.
On the circumstances leading to
the issuance of the statement and the denial by Babangida, Falana said no
criminal offence known to law has been committed by the journalist to warrant
the action of the IGP since the two leaders (Buhari and Babangida) have not
complained that the controversial statement defamed them.
He added: “In fact, if the
statement is considered defamatory whoever is injured would have to institute a
civil suit where he will be required to put his own reputation in issue. In
Arthur Nwankwo v The State (1985) 4 NCLR 228, the Court of Appeal had cautioned
public officers in Nigeria to desist from invoking undemocratic laws which were
introduced by the erstwhile British colonial regime to harass or intimidate
their political opponents. According to Olajide Olatawura JCA (as he then was
of blessed memory):
“The decision of the founding
fathers of this present Constitution which guarantees freedom of speech which
must include freedom to criticize should be praised and any attempt to derogate
from it except as provided in the Constitution must be resisted. Those in
public office should not be intolerant of criticism. Where a writer exceeds the
bounds there should be a resort to the law of libel where the plaintiff must of
necessity put his character and reputation in issue.”
“Since Gen. Babangida has now
turned round to insist that he authorised Mr. Afegbua to issue the
controversial statement it is hoped that he will be prepared to say so in a
criminal court. His testimony will go a long way to destroy the criminal case
which the Inspector-General intends to institute against Mr. Afegbua. However,
the IGP should be advised not to popularise the discredited views of both
Generals Olusegun Obasanjo and Ibrahim Babangida who failed woefully to
institutionalised democracy, rule of law, human rights, self -reliance and
probity during the 20 years that both of them had ruled the country.”
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everydayAdvertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com