BREAKING NEWS
Breaking

728x90

468x60

APC in the land of ‘Fabu’ - Femi Aribisala


FABU” is a Yoruba slang denoting an exaggerated lie. It points to a tall tale; a gross distortion of the truth. “Fabu” is a shortened form of the English word “fabulate,” which refers to the composition of fables or stories featuring a strong element of fantasy and lies. Without a doubt, within the Nigerian political stratosphere, APC is a party that lives in “fabuland.”



Art of fabulation: The chief exponent of APC fabulation is Lai Mohammed. He was formerly the party’s National Publicity Secretary, a post in which he distinguished himself. This has now earned him promotion to the post of Minister of Information and Culture. In this new capacity, Mohammed has already begun to fine-tune his art of fabulation. No sooner had he become Minister than he went ahead to tell Nigerians that fuel scarcity would soon be a thing of the past.

These are his words delivered with characteristic aplomb at the Abuja office of Daily Trust newspapers on 2 December, 2015: “We can confidently announce here today that the (fuel) scarcity will end in a few days. The National Assembly has approved subsidy payment till the end of the year. As you know, we can’t spend money without approval. We can assure you that we won’t be caught in this kind of situation again.”

They call this kind of “fabu” “famous last words.” Anyone living in Nigeria this Christmas season can bear witness to the extent to which Mohammed’s words have originated from APC’s fantasy fabuland. In Lagos, for example, the roads are completely clogged like at no other time because they have been overtaken by cars queuing for fuel. More than ever before, it now takes literally hours on end to go from A to B.

Confusion galore

Ibe Kachikwu, the Minister of State for Petroleum, has quickly come out with another pie-in-the-sky from APC’s “fabuland,” conveniently changing Mohammed’s fabulous goalpost without even batting an eyelid. Speaking to the party’s big-guns from Delta State, Kachikwu promises to bring about fundamental changes in Nigeria’s oil sector not before the end of 2015, but before the end of 2016.

Hear him: “The country’s oil sector will experience a turnaround such that the refineries will work effectively and products will be made available to the people at an affordable price within 365 days.”

You begin to wonder whether APC members even bother to coordinate their own fabulations. Would any right-thinking Nigerian buy a used car from any member of the APC today? I doubt it! Apparently, the government has determined that we should fill our tanks with “fabu” instead of petrol this holiday season. What does this mean for those planning to travel home for Christmas and the New Year?

Non-existent petrol subsidy

During the heated debate in 2012, when President Jonathan sought to remove the petroleum subsidy, the APC championed national revolt against the government. People occupied the streets and the government was forced to back down. General Buhari came out to tell Nigerians that the whole issue of petroleum subsidy was one big government scam.

He said: “I don’t understand what the Nigerian economists and the members of the government are calling subsidy. Who is subsidising who? If anybody says he is subsidising anything, it is a fraud. So all these people talking about subsidy; who is subsidising who?”

But now that Buhari is not only president, but also the unofficial Minister of Petroleum Resources; the subsidy is apparently no longer fraudulent. His position now is that this “fraud” is in the interest of Nigerians. Speaking at a briefing by the petroleum ministry on 13 July, 2015, the president said:

“I have received many literature on the need to remove subsidies, but much of it has no depth. When you touch the price of petroleum products; that has the effect of triggering price rises on transportation, food and rents. That is for those who earn salaries, but there are many who are jobless and will be affected by it.”

We may well ask why Mr. President is now trying to defend and retain something he claimed was fraudulent and even non-existent. “Who is now subsidising who?”

“Buhari tax”: Under Jonathan, Senator Bola Tinubu, the so-called National Leader of the APC, rallied Nigerians against the removal of the petroleum subsidy. He castigated the government’s attempt to remove the subsidy as a wicked tool designed to impoverish Nigerians. These were his words:

“As there is progressive politics, there is progressive economics. As there is elitist politics, there is elitist economics. It all depends on what and who in society government would rather favour. The Jonathan tax represents a new standard in elitism. Because he is slave to wrong-headed economics the people will become enslaved to greater misery.

Same petroleum subsidy

This crisis will bear his name and will be his legacy. The people now pay a steep tax for voting him into office. The removal of the subsidy is the ‘Jonathan tax.’”

But now that the APC is in power, Tinubu is calling for the removal of the same petroleum subsidy he lampooned Jonathan for trying to remove. Speaking at the memorial anniversary of the passing of the late Bala Usman on 18 December, 2015, Tinubu said:

“I have reached the conclusion that there are too many demons in the system for that hell to be turned into heaven. It is better that we remove it, not for the austere purpose of saving money but to use the money more wisely that we might better save the people. Let us begin a process of a thoughtful, but decisive subsidy phase-out.”

What are we to make of this hypocrisy? According to Tinubu, the removal of the petroleum subsidy under the PDP would amount to a Jonathan tax designed to enslave the people to greater misery. But under the APC, the removal of the subsidy would be a Buhari tax that would save the people. Which of these “fabu” are we supposed to believe? I repeat, can any right-thinking Nigerian buy a used car from any APC member today?

The end of Boko Haram: In an interview with Christiane Amanpour of CNN, Buhari boasted he would defeat Boko Haram within two months if elected president. This was how the “fabu” was expressed at the time: “We know how they started and where they are now and we will rapidly give attention to security in the country. And I believe we will effectively deal with them in two months when we get into office.”But once elected, the president insisted this “fabu” was the creation of his opponents. He said: “I think I am too experienced in internal security to give two months deadline on Boko Haram. I don’t think I would have made that statement. I didn’t.”

Nevertheless, the president could not resist coming up with another “fabu” to replace the earlier one. At a meeting in October 2015 with General Rodriguez, Commander of the United States’ Africa Command, the same President Buhari who said he could not have declared it would take only two months to defeat Boko Haram, now said the insurgency would be defeated in three months.

Structured attacks

Hear him: “Structured attacks by the insurgents have reduced and by the end of the year, we should see the final routing of Boko Haram as an organised fighting force.” He again reiterated this “fabu” on Al Jazeera’s Up Front magazine: “As soon as the rainy season comes (to an end), which is by the end of the year, Boko Haram will virtually be out of their main stronghold and that will be the end of it.”

Only God knows why the president finds it necessary to come out with this kind of “fabu.” It is the kind of thing even the president of superpower United States would not dare to make. However, our very own APC members live permanently in fabuland. Their “fabus” are on never-ending auto-pilot. They come one after the other and are never impeded by reason, logic or even outright contradictions.

The government spends a lot of time coming up with “fabus,” denying them, defending them and varnishing them. The president has even found it necessary to reassure his teeming supporters that he will not resign because a “fabu” is discovered incontrovertibly to be a “fabu.” He told Al Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan that if Boko Haram is not defeated by December: “I will not resign.”

But why declare the “fabu” in the first place if it can later be ignored? The “fabu” is simply a hyperbole to be fed periodically to the public, in lieu of concrete public policy.

Anti-corruption “fabu”

One of the biggest, if not the biggest, “fabu” of this APC government is that it is fighting corruption when, in actual fact, anti-corruption is merely an instrument for decimating the PDP and establishing a one-party APC state. Today, APC carefully ignores its own corrupt members while going after the PDP exclusively.

In order not to scare off dodgy members of his party with his anti-corruption “fabu,” Buhari promised to let corrupt sleeping dogs lie if elected: “A few people have privately voiced fears that on coming back to office I shall go after them. These fears are groundless. There will be no paying off old scores. The past is prologue,” he said.

He further elaborated on this at the APC campaign rally in Kaduna: “Whoever that is indicted of corruption between 1999 to the time of swearing-in, would be pardoned. I am going to draw a line, anybody who involved himself in corruption after I assume office, will face the music.”

But now that that “fabu” has fulfilled its purpose, it has been conveniently jettisoned. Of course, APC members remain untouchable; Buhari’s anti-corruption is now only applicable to the PDP. However, it might not be so cut and dry as the president would like. Buhari himself is implicated in the “fabu” of Dasukigate, which would have Nigerians believe that while PDP used public funds illegally for party-political purposes, the APC did not.

In July 2014, Buhari’s SUV was attacked and damaged. Two SUVs were given to him to replace the damaged one. The two-for-one replacement contravenes section 3(1) of the Remuneration of Former Presidents and Heads of State Act of 2004. According to that Act, Buhari is not entitled to any new vehicles until 2016; and certainly not from the office of the NSA. We can expect to hear more “fabus” on this issue as the case continues to go out of control.

Would any right-thinking Nigerian buy a used car from any member of the APC today? Only Buharimaniacs still seem inclined to do so.

Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday


Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
« PREV
NEXT »

13 comments

  1. lolz. messy Fabu with bad smell... please don't you ever stop. you forgot the chibok girls fabu. that one had been discarded but it is still smelling.

    ReplyDelete
  2. lolz. messy Fabu with bad smell... please don't you ever stop. you forgot the chibok girls fabu. that one had been discarded but it is still smelling.

    ReplyDelete
  3. well said. buharimaniacs are quiet

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hahahaha!!! I really love u Oga Aribasala. Where is Mr. Lie Mohammed Fabu.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What do you expect from someone whose name is Lai? He is expected to lie. He is a natural born lair!
    Period!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Aribisala u knw everything.. ITK u analyze everything....a right thinking person will knw dat..,,I av been following ur write up for long..u never mean well for our country..u always criticise n never propose solution..dat means u r a sadist..u av grey hair bt u criticize like a baby

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is sad that an old man like Lai Mohammad will be lying this much because of position and politics. It is unfortunate that this man is behaving this way because in Yorubaland elders are noted for speaking the truth. So, tell me the kind of legacy this man is bequeathing to his children and other youths? Lies! Lies! and Lies!. It is a shame.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What a masterpiece! Baba cannot stop dazing me.What of #5,000 monthly allowance for unemployed youths, the promised 2 million employments, free meal for pupils at school etc, etc ??? When Fabu is added to Buhari(Fabu+Buhari), the answer is undoubtedly Fabuhari.Now we have President Fabuhari, who has in stored so many Fabus for us to feed on. But as events are unfolding, I keep on watching us enjoying Fabus.

    ReplyDelete
  9. vrey old biased mind,imagine this man call himself pastor n he sees nothing wrong in people looting with impunity anyway,perverted mind called ur followers ll continue celebrating but as for us God will shall prevail.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Is there anything sense in this write up?I am ashamed this is coming from a spiritual leader. I wonder what he preaches on the podium . say what will positively impact on the life of average Nigerians,not all these rubbish.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous 12:44, how many times were you able to distinguish little thieves in your household; don't tell me you are all angels? I am sure you are one of the millions of Nigerians who will sell their integrity for APC FABUS.

    Just barely six month, we have taken more than aenough lies from APC; what would Nigerians expect in the next three years to come?

    ReplyDelete
  12. If you consider the fight against corruption as one sided, you can do your bit as a good Nigerian to expose those you know as currupt individuals from the other camp for the law to take its proper cause. Your failure in this regard will render you culpable. If you don't have sufficient facts to indict anybody, then it would be better for you to keep quiet and stop criticising and judging others. ab

    ReplyDelete
  13. Aribisala's comment on petroleum subsidy is straight to the point. This is very constructive,and I believe a wise government would not see that as derogatory but rather as a weakness worth addressing. Past administrations had always used this issue of subsidy to exploit and deceive the populace.

    However,I believe strongly that any attempt to credit or discredit a political party is a huge humbug that lacks sincerity. There is no party in Nigeria that has consistent membership -it's all about regrouping and changing of nomenclature.There is no ideology or philosophy that differentiates one from another, except that all have a common corporate and individual objective- to grab and grab and....grab, thereby neglecting their promise to serve.

    Corruption is not an outbreak of social ill in the country,rather it crept into the society almost shortly after we attained sovereignty and was nurtured and grown to a wild dimension that we have today. I was in a university outside the country several decades ago as a private student. It was the practice in those days to apply for Fed. Govt loan,which I did like other co-Nigerian students in that school. To our dismay,the list of beneficiaries that came from the embassy were ghost students.

    The damage corruption has done to the society rises in geometrical proportion when we compare the past with the present. In those days you could have correspondence with government establishment by post,but now it's just impossible because of certain facilities that have become extinct. The stationery that used to be supplied by the Ministry of Home Affairs is no longer there. In fact the post office has been reduced to a private entrepreneur. You can no longer have mails delivered to your home for want of specific home number and street. Besides,letters and especially parcels coming from abroad run the risk of not reaching their destinations at the onslaught of pilferers. In fact one could write volumes of books on the extent of moral decadence in the society.

    A forefront politician was imprisoned for misappropriation some years ago. On completing his jail term he was embraced by admirers with pomp and pageantry. Similarly a deposed State governor was prevented from being tried for a criminal charge by a group of thugs and the government bowed. Incidentally this same culprit eventually found his way back to be the number one citizen of that same State. It is lamentable. If these should continue unabated the future is very bleak.

    In a situation like this only a WISE DICTATOR with an iron hand is what the country needs if we are to be reckoned with as a nation. Unfortunately,this is an uphill task in a democratic setting. The Army had the opportunity to do this but was flawed through greed. If there is a leader who identifies the problem and wants to retrace the path we should encourage and support him. I believe that no mortal being is infallible and so such leader could be criticized but not with derogatory intent. Those who have to work with him must be the materials available in the society,more so when the federal character must be reflected.-Eddie

    ReplyDelete

Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)

Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com