A quick intervention by the leadership of the House of Representatives on Wednesday doused tension between the Peoples Democratic Party members and their counterparts in the All Progressives Congress.
Findings showed that the PDP Caucus was bent on enforcing the “relevant aspects” of Monday’s judgment by an Abuja Federal High Court, which declared the defection of some PDP lawmakers in the House to the APC as unconstitutional.
The court had also barred the lawmakers from effecting a change in the leadership of the House.
Among others, the court ruled that the defected lawmakers should no longer participate in the activities of the House, including contributing to motions on the floor.
Justice Adeniyi Ademola, who delivered the judgment, had also advised the affected lawmakers to resign honourably from the House.
Although the lawmakers had already appealed the judgment, It was learnt that the PDP caucus was bent on restraining them from attending sittings.
The APC Caucus in the House had on Tuesday opposed the judgment on the grounds that the judge granted “reliefs” not sought by the PDP in its originating suit.
The caucus had argued that the “import of the judgment is that the lawmakers cannot remove the leadership of the House, nothing more, nothing less.”
However, investigations showed that acting on an alleged directive from their national headquarters, the PDP members made moves on Wednesday to stop the defected legislators from sitting.
Members of the caucus had held a meeting on Wednesday morning, preceding the day’s sitting, where the matter was reportedly discussed.
The APC caucus also quickly convened a similar meeting to strategise on how to respond to the plan of the PDP caucus.
The Speaker, Mr. Aminu Tambuwal, got wind of the development and hurriedly called for an executive session soon after the sitting began.
A source close to the House leadership said, “There was tension in the (Wednesday) morning. That fact was not lost on both camps. The PDP members were planning to pass a ‘psychological message’ to their APC colleagues.
“But, the APC members too had their own response strategies worked out.”
The source informed our correspondent that there would have been a “stormy session” but for the executive session.
At the executive session, the leadership of the House reportedly preached peace to both sides.
The PDP Caucus members were said to have been told to place “national unity above party affiliation.”
Findings also showed that both camps were advised to allow the court cases run their full course rather than trying to interfere.
It was learnt that the PDP caucus still resolved to meet again after the sitting to review the decisions taken at the executive session in a bid to decide on the way forward.
The Deputy Chairman, House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Victor Ogene, later confirmed at a news conference that the executive session was devoted to the court judgment.
According to him, the speaker called on the session to allow members talk frankly to one another.
He said the session observed that it was the tradition of the House not to interfere with ongoing cases in courts.
Ogene said, “We decided to talk (frontally) among ourselves; to get each other’s viewpoint.
“We also talked on the need to allow the different court cases on defection to run their full course.
“We have had instances where members who defected earlier before now are still participating in the activities of the House.
“So, let us allow the cases to run their full course.”
He also said the session expressed concern over the growing influence of political parties on the conduct of the House, especially during plenaries.
The lawmaker added, “There is so much of party affiliation creeping into our activities, compared to when the 7th House started in June 2011.
“That point was well taken by all the members present at the executive session.”
Ogene denied that Tambuwal was under pressure to declare the seats of the defected lawmakers vacant, a reason that could have explained his calling the executive session.
“There was no pressure on Mr. Speaker to declare anybody’s seat vacant. There was nothing like that. I can tell you that the speaker is not under pressure,” he insisted.
Ogene also denied media reports indicating that Tambuwal and his deputy, Mr. Emeka Ihedioha, appealed the judgment in their personal capacity as presiding officers.
He explained that the two officials were joined as respondents in the suit, not that they originated the suit in the first place.
Ogene added that it would have been appropriate to report that the defected lawmakers had appealed the judgment since they were the ones directly affected, not the speaker.
Ihedioha himself also explained that he could not have appealed the judgment because he was merely a “nominal party” to the case.
In a statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Mr. Oke Epia, he complained that the reports created a wrong impression that he was against the interest of the PDP.
Part of the statement reads, “For the avoidance of doubt, the Deputy Speaker wishes to clarify that he is just a nominal party in the suit by virtue of his office and counsel was briefed by the management of the National Assembly to represent the House of Representatives as an institution.
“The appeal was primarily instituted by the members who defected from the PDP to the APC.” Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com