As the nation forges ahead in its strenuous struggle against Boko Haram
insurgency with the imposition of emergency rule in Borno, Yobe and
Adamawa states, one can confidently say that we are out of the state of
seeming indecision that characterized the government’s response to the
challenge of insecurity.
Prior to the widely-applauded declaration of state of emergency in
three states by President Goodluck Jonathan the nation was gripped with
agonizing anxiety over the apparent deadly resilience of the insurgents
to what was supposed to be a robust military intervention. This
disillusionment spurred the concerted calls for dialogue and possible
amnesty in palpable desperation.
Unfortunately, there was no reciprocal response from the insurgents
who defiantly doubled their attacks in the North-East sector where they
had retreated to but certainly not for surrender purposes.
By the time reliable reports confirmed that up to 14 of the 27 local
government areas in Borno State had practically fallen to the forces of
insurgency, there could not have been any alternative to a drastic
intervention to re-assert Nigeria’s sovereignty and decisively halt and
eliminate the entrenched insurgents.
Since the massive deployment of the military with all its arsenals to
the three worst-hit states no one can deny that the battle has indeed
been taken to the doorsteps of the terrorists with salutary effects on
the situation.
While all these scenarios are reasonable, logical and progressive in
pursuit of the national interest, it was somehow objectionable to some
groups of Nigerians for reasons that are patently unpatriotic to say the
least.
Signs of the presence of hypocrites, blackmailers and allied
refuseniks lurking around came up even before the state of emergency
broadcast by President Jonathan as orchestrated opposition to the option
erupted even from such unlikely quarters as the Northern Governors’
Forum.
All sorts of contrived arguments were bandied about dedicated to
discouraging the government from moving in the right direction. It is to
the credit of the President that he was able to execute the policy
swiftly and deftly, thereby earning the re-considered endorsement of the
nay-sayers soon after his broadcast.
Now we know that the Northern governors’ unexpected cold feet
reaction was propelled by their selfish interest which was fixated on
the likelihood of emergency rule ousting some of their colleagues,
recalling what happened in the Obasanjo era.
Others who rallied round the governors in objecting to the imposition
of emergency rule must be similarly motivated. Appropriately, the
majority of Nigerians who supported the imposition of emergency rule in
Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states have correctly concluded that the critics
could not care less if the country gets overrun by the insurgents
because it is so glaring that the nation was tottering on the brinks of
destabilization.
Not even the pro-dialogue advocates can successfully sustain an
objection to the necessity for emergency rule. The carrot of dialogue
and negotiated ceasefire and even amnesty have all along been on the
table but was unattractive and unproductive due to the condemnable
failure of the state governors concerned to muster their supposed local
clout and connection as chief security officers of their states to
effectively check the deadly activities of the insurgents in their midst
before everything went hay-wire.
Even in pursuit of the dialogue and amnesty option the governors
performed woefully and had no encouraging results to show. The case for
ousting them from office during the period of emergency rule was
unassailable! As if to score another point, the President again directed
for the release of all women and certain category of the insurgents to
complete the circle of the carrot and stick initiative.
The inclusion of Adamawa State in the emergency rule cover was also
the subject of agitated comments questioning the rationale. Even
Governor Nyako who, as a retired military top shot, ought to know better
went on air to express misgivings even as he had no choice but to
submit to superior authority.
It should not be difficult to understand that the borders of the
three states now under emergency rule are strategically critical to the
success of any military offensive in the areas affected, given the
increasing evidence of cross-border incursions and foreign elements’
involvement in boosting the insurgency.
As with the emergency rule it is not surprising that the people of
Adamawa have since come to terms with the strategic sense of it all.
All said, President Jonathan has cleared any lingering doubt about
his capacity to act decisively when the occasion arises and has proven
his innate patience and focus to address emerging issues copiously.
He should use the lessons of the politics of imposition of emergency
rule to put governors in their proper place down under whenever the
national interest is the subject matter.
After all at the end of the day, he is the Commander-in-Chief as well
as the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and on his
shoulders rest the fate of the nation, especially in times of adversity.
Posterity will prove him right!
Mr. MUSTAPHA MINJIBIR, a commentator on national issues, wrote from Kano, Kano State.
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com