The Presidency on Thursday slammed the leadership of the National
Assembly, describing the budget-related criticisms levelled against
President Goodluck Jonathan as an attempt to rubbish the 2013 budget
proposals.
President Jonathan had presented the proposals to a
joint session of the National Assembly on Wednesday. At the budget
presentation, Senate President, David Mark, had told President Jonathan
that the National Assembly would not be a rubber-stamp legislature.
Also, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mallam Aminu
Tambuwal, had subtly accused the President of poor implementation of the
2012 budget.
But speaking in Abuja, the Special Assistant to the
President on Public Communication, Dr. Doyin Okupe, said it was sad
that President Jonathan could be subjected to what he described as a
“harrowing experience” during the presentation.
“Normal
legislative courtesy demands that such a visitor (President Jonathan) be
allowed to perform his constitutional functions without any attempt to
rubbish the document that was yet to be discussed even by the members
themselves,” he said.
The presidential aide, who stressed that he
was speaking for the Presidency, also said it was wrong for the
lawmakers to have summoned the President in the manner they did
recently.
“My belief is that in the interest of the Nigerian
people, for the sake of our masses, the National Assembly and the
Executive must of necessity find a common ground on all these issues,
instead of unnecessary grandstanding and playing to the gallery, which
will not help anybody,” he added.
Rubber-stamp legislature
Okupe
said it was wrong for Mark to have the notion that the President merely
wanted the two chambers to rubber-stamp the budget proposals.
He
said, “The President and his administration do not expect and has never
conceived the idea that the National Assembly would just rubber-stamp
whatever is presented to it.
“It is quite clear that this is not a
high-handed administration and it does not wish in any way to be one.
In a healthy democracy, there is useful exchange of ideas and
deliberations over various issues of national importance until
reasonable agreements are reached.”
Okupe also quarrelled with
Mark’s description of the proposal as a “mere estimate”, adding that the
description diminished the quality of the budget proposal. “To call
these figures as mere estimates is rather unfair.” he said angrily.
The
spokesperson also defended his principal against accusation that the
2012 budget was poorly implemented. Okupe said that the budget had been
approved in April, adding that under the law, therefore, the budget had
just been implemented for five months only.
He said that the
President’s explanation on Wednesday that N711.6bn had been expended on
capital projects showed that 53 per cent of the budget had been already
disbursed in five months.
He, therefore, said that the issue of
implementation could not be taken in isolation without considering when
the lawmakers passed the budget.
Tambuwal’s speech unfortunate
Commenting
on Tambuwal’s remarks at the presentation, Okupe said it was
unfortunate that the Speaker veered from giving a vote of thanks into
making a speech.
“Some of the issues raised by the Speaker were
erroneous. He said that interim oversight reports were clearly
unimpressive. This statement cannot be wholesomely acceptable if you
look at the background and the reason for which the assemblymen
hurriedly packaged (the budget verification) visits,” he said.
He
added that it was amazing that the members of the House of
Representatives could go round the country in just one week and returned
to conclude that budget implementation was poor.
“There are
procedures for spending government money. The time of Father Christmas
or flushing of ministries with funds that are irresponsibly expended is
over,” he said.
Okupe said the Speaker’s complaint that the
Bureau for Public Procurement had become a bottleneck to effective
capital budget implementation was unfortunate.
“National revenue
should not be altered on the altar of speedy disbursing of money to the
MDAs. I do not want to believe that the speaker is saying the control
measure should be abrogated,” he said.
The presidential aide
described the insistence of the House that government should drop the
$75 per barrel benchmark in the budget for an $80 per barrel benchmark
as “pure drama.”
Okupe said, “Here is another arm of government,
in a dictatorial manner, saying authoritatively, that it has decided
that the benchmark shall be $80. One would have expected that he would
have explained the parameter with which he got the benchmark.
“You
will recall that in 2008 at the peak of oil boom when one barrel of oil
was selling for $147, suddenly because of massive global economic
downturn the price went to $38 per barrel.”
He named Algeria
($38); Qatar ($55); Venezuela ($50); Saudi ($60); Angola ($77); and
Kuwait ($60) as some of the countries with benchmarks lower than
Nigeria’s.
“This is not the time to be unduly careless, or reckless about our benchmark. It is time to be conservative.”
House reacts
Reacting
to Okupe’s comments, the Speaker of the House of Representatives said
that the issues he raised on the budget were backed by facts and
figures.
A statement by his Special Assistant, Media and Public
Affairs, Mr. Imam Imam, described Okupe as an “ignorant” official, who
knew little about the issues at stake.
The statement says, “It is
apparent that Okupe is dabbling in areas which he is totally ignorant
about. The uncouth manner in which he replied elected representatives
showed his apparent lack of respect to the legislature as an
institution.
“The entire remarks he made gave him out as an
overzealous official doing a hatchet job in order to be relevant in the
scheme of things. The Speaker and the House of Representatives will
always stand by the tenets of good governance and true representation at
all times.”
In a similar vein, the Deputy Chairman, House
Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Victor Ogene, said Okupe was
merely seeking relevance.
He said, “For Okupe to seek to denounce
this position simply because some other oil producing nations have
lower benchmarks of $75 clearly shows how the Nigerian economy is run,
in a do–as–I–do fashion.
“On the issue of poor implementation
of the capital budget for 2012, which Okupe attributed to
non-utilisation of already released votes, there could be no better
self-indictment, as all the Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs)
that ought to execute these projects are all under the Executive branch.
“For
the avoidance of doubt – and at the risk of sounding monotonous –
Speaker Tambuwal is not on a popularity contest with any official of
government. Instead, he embodies the wishes and aspirations of the
Nigerian People, and expresses, at every point, only the position of the
360- member House of Representatives.”
Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
Home
Latest News in Nigeria
Mark, Tambuwal Unfair To Jonathan: Precidency
Mark, Tambuwal Unfair To Jonathan: Precidency
NigerianEye
-
Friday, October 12, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments
Post a Comment
Kindly drop a comment below.
(Comments are moderated. Clean comments will be approved immediately)
Advert Enquires - Reach out to us at NigerianEye@gmail.com