President Goodluck Jonathan, attending the International Earth Summit in Brazil, came under attack, yesterday, for leaving the country at the height of insecurity in some parts of the country.
The attack against the president came from opposition quarters and remarkably from even close quarters in the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, including some legislators elected on the party’s platform.
Remarkably, senior government officials pressed on the issue expressed discomfort that the president might well not have been fully briefed on the continuing crisis in the country which led to the reinstatement of a complete curfew in Kaduna, yesterday.
Among the president’s critics were the Action Congress of Nigeria, ACN; civil rights lawyer, Bamidele Aturu and members of the House of Representatives. An exception came from Senate spokesman, Senator Enyinninya Abaribe, who said the president might have been compelled to undertake his trip on the basis of international commitments.
It’s reflective of insensitive, confused leadership —ACN
Describing the president’s action as reflective of an insensitive and confused leadership, the ACN in a statement said the President ought to have cancelled the trip, no matter how important, as a symbolic show of solidarity with grieving Nigerians.
It said: “Again, we are constrained to ask whether this President is getting quality advice from the myriad of aides surrounding him, or whether, like his benefactor, Olusegun Obasanjo, he has decided he may not even take any advice from his advisers.
“In other climes, the usual thing is for leaders to cancel foreign trips or rush home from such trips when their countries suffer tragedies.
“In April 2010, Chinese President Hu Jintao cut short his Latin American tour and returned home after a strong earthquake hit the west of China; this year, South Sudanese President Salva Kiir returned home early from his visit to China, due to the rising tension along the border of his country with Sudan, and even a phone-hacking scandal was enough for British Prime Minister David Cameron to cut short an African trade tour and return.
“Since our own President has not even left Nigeria when these latest tragedies broke, it is inexplicable that he will still hop into a plane with a huge entourage and fly out. He should realise that he is attending the conference because he is the President of Nigeria, not because he is Dr. Jonathan. Therefore, Nigeria’s paramount interest dictates that he stays at home and oversees efforts to prevent the precarious situation in Kaduna from degenerating into an all-out religious war.”
He should be sensitive to plight of his people —Reps
The anger was also reflected in the House of Representatives. Rep. Zakari Mohammed, in his reaction told Vanguard that the President’s action was tantamount to a father who abandoned his house while it was on fire.
He said: “He swore to an oath to protect lives and property of his citizens. Is this the right time for him to move when his house is on fire? He should be more sensitive to the plight of his people and take the right decision at the right time.”
Rep. Abiodun Faleke, representing Ikeja Federal Constituency said “while his people are being buried for his lack of security effectiveness, yet he travelled to another country to tell the world about his weakness or his transformation agenda.”
Femi Gbajabamila, the House minority leader said: “I am taken aback that at a time when the country is under siege Mr President has travelled to far away Brazil.”
It’s a sad commentary —Aturu
Civil rights lawyer, Mr Bamidele Aturu, while lamenting the lack of effectiveness of the President’s security measures said the President’s presence would in any way not have meant anything, describing it as a sad commentary.
He nevertheless described the President’s action as born of poor judgment.
“His leaving the country does not make any difference because even when he was around, the security agencies could really not do anything. People are being butchered anyhow and life, it seems, does not mean anything. We had on our part asked him to rejig the security agencies but he did not. So for me, leaving for an international assignment does not make any difference which is itself, a very sad commentary.
“They are just killing our people anyhow and he has chosen this time to travel, it is very sad because for me, this is not the time to travel. And it is so sad because the protection of lives, according to the constitution, shall be the primary reason of government.”
Senate defends Jonathan
The rare exception was, however, from the Senate whose spokesman, Senator Abaribe tongue-in-cheek said: “The Senate is not in the habit of running the country, it is a different arm of the government and I believe that if we have international obligations, we must keep to them. The Senate knows that the executive arm has its own responsibility and the Senate has its own responsibility.”
The issue, however, raised some embarrassment for some senior government officials who, yesterday, sought to pass the buck to aides who, it was alleged, might not have fully briefed the President on the severity of the crisis in the country.
Vanguard Click to signup for FREE news updates, latest information and hottest gists everyday
Advertise on NigerianEye.com to reach thousands of our daily users
I totally agree with Mr Bamidele Aturu. It makes no difference.
ReplyDeleteYes! It makes no difference!!!. If he had stayed by cancelling the trip to Brazil; Boko Haram would be poping their champange by now for disrupting the President's trip. Let the Governor handle it first!!! Punpido...
ReplyDelete...is this an impeachable offense? they should stop complaining and do the needful. all of them would have done exactly the same if they were in his shoes. that is not saying that his actions are right anyway. do the needful, impeach him for lack of leadership, that's not rocket science
ReplyDeleteIt really makes no difference even if that guy were to be in the country. So let him just keep globe-throtting while his subjects get killed.
ReplyDeletei tink i now understand d Ibo proverb dat says dat wen a neighbor is goin 2 bury his dead,d bystander sees it as if it's a log of wood dat's insyd d cofin.GEJ's relativs hv nt bin affected by dis whole tragedy so...if he felt d pain of his citizns, he wld hv tot beta of goin out. Mayb,sorry 2 say, he badly needed d luxury of travelin out & d alowances atached 2 it. In any case, may God guide him on d path of good,selfless leadership.
ReplyDeleteOur president is too young in knowledge and too soft to rule nigeria. We need a very tough and simple wise man to rule dat country. But finally,its a big shame dat common boko haram is terrorising a whole country while the police and military are there.!!!
ReplyDeleteDavid cameron rushed back home here in england during a common london riot last year that cost just a life..... how much more where thousands r killed? u see, thats y we dont wanna come back to that fuckin country where there is insecurity and instability. nigeria is 3rd to the last risky and dangerous country since after the plan crash. yet we hv the got to show face in the earth summit.. what r we gonna talk about there??.we r still watching ,, if goodluck and co cannot stop boko haram, fish them out as soon as possible, then get the idiots responsible for the negligence of duty that caused the plan crash, then i know nigeria is a beach ruled by ass holes,
ReplyDeleteALL THE TIMES THE PRESIDENT WAS IN COUNTRY HAVE THE SPONSORS OF THE BOKO HARAM STOPPED THEIR ACTIONS. BOKO HARAM IS A POLITICAL AGENDA THAT IS BEEN USED BY SOME ELEMENTS OF THE POLITICAL DIVIDE. IT IS NOT RELIGIOUS. WE GOT TO UNDERSTAND THIS NOW. THIS IS BEYOND JONATHAN'S TRAVEL. AT THE CENTER OF THE BOKO HARAM ARE THE POLITICAL GLADIATORS OF NIGERIA,.
ReplyDeleteWhen leaders that should support the President in this dire times ,
ReplyDeleteare using it to score cheap political points. I believe there are ways to advise the GEJ, without scoring cheap points. Instead Hon Gbajabiamilla pick up the phone and call.
We have heard all sorts about Boko haram, no one has clarified.
Please politicians move on and lets see progress first in your constituenies before you criticism MR President!